Asset Level Physical Climate Risk Disclosure


Transition and physical risk intersect with the climate risk asset to create a difficult interplay.

In-depth investor analysis is required to assess company and asset climate risk.

There are no clear patterns indicating how resilient corporate assets are.

Care must be taken when analyzing this information with regard to specific locations and industries.

The Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures provides companies and investors with guidelines to better understand and disclose their physical and transitioning climate risks.

These risks are identified and disclosed in a standardized way under the TCFD guidelines.

Companies only considered material risks and opportunities when calculating their climate change materiality.

For 51% of companies, the materiality criteria was kept a secret.

Portfolio managers concerned about physical and transition risks typically covered similar topics in their reports.

Disclosed risks typically include short-term and long-term implications for the portfolio and assets.

It's difficult to comprehend what these terrifying risk estimates mean for individual businesses and the financial institutions that lend to and invest in them.

A group of scholars from both finance and climate disciplines identified four major reasons for this in an article called “Asset-Level Climate and Cascading Financial Losses.”

It's hard to prove financial losses from physical hazards such as weather.

This is because current analysis methods for climate hazards aren't well enough to connect them to people's assets- or even physical goods in general. Because these risks remain murky, many institutions cannot properly determine their physical risk.


I- Physical climate risk disclosures for asset owners

Studying this issue marks a major step in the development of space finance.

Another beneficial consequence is the increased transparency of companies regarding their tangible assets.

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission proposed the climate risk disclosure rule with the goal of making regulatory initiatives.

The rule was meant to be like other initiatives such as the rule proposed by the SEC.

The proposed rule from the SEC states that companies must identify the location of their property, process or operation when determining physical risks.

This information must be found at the zip code level.

Providing more location-based asset data would be greatly enhanced by making such disclosures.

Companies and investors should seek to better understand their climate Risk using guidelines provided by the Taskforce on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.

They should also make greater environmental disclosures and transparency.

Accurate long-term information about an asset's worth is crucial when disclosing it.

This is because investing in real assets is a long-term venture.

Potential customers will demand to know the physical hazard mitigation measures installed at the property level.

Although the long-term effects of some climate change elements remain uncertain, they will increasingly want to know about this information when buying real estate assets.

When performing financial due diligence when selling an asset, using the TCFD structure is a reliable shortcut.

Providing a report using this template aligns all information related to material climate topics.


II- Risk assessment for physical climate risks

Many businesses need information about physical climate risks in order to assess and disclose these risks.

This is an evolving and growing challenge that many businesses face.

There are even business centers that provide this information so that their clients can measure downtime and loss of cash.

Probabilistic physical climate risk assessments determine the potential damage caused by specific acute physical risks such as hurricanes, floods and wildfires.

The second step is to perform a risk assessment that shows the damage potential caused by all physical assets.

From 2035 to 2050, the assessment covers the risk of tropical cyclones in Mexico on various time scales.

This includes covering the risks of Mexico's climate change on a short-term basis, 2035, or a long-term basis, 2050.

New laws and technological advances are likely to make physical risk assessment easier.

The barriers to this assessment aren't insurmountable, and they're likely to decrease in the future.

Another big issue when doing bank assessments is creating reliable methods.

Plus récente Plus ancienne